Your One-Stop Crypto Investment Powerhouse

オーバーン大学のADジョン・コーエンが左レーンに、ハーシンが右レーンに。全力で攻めて、この男をスタジアムから吹き飛ばそう!

Auburn AD John Cohen in the left lane with Harsin in the right lane. Take it to the max and blow this guy out of the stadium!
Quavoscribe11-07 22:06
AIによる翻訳
Selena Gomez's alleged legal trouble with Celsius Energy Drink has taken an unexpected turn. Just a few months after the news broke, Gomez has filed a motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit that accused her of being involved in the development of the drink. The lawsuit claimed that Gomez's Instagram post promoting the drink led to a surge of sales and an increase in stock prices for Celsius, causing financial losses for investors. However, in a recent court filing, Gomez's attorney argued that the allegations against her are "baseless" and that she should not be held liable for promoting a product that was already on the market before her post. The motion cites several legal precedents that support Gomez's claim, including a 2008 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that a celebrity's endorsement of a product does not constitute securities fraud if the product was already being sold at retail. The plaintiffs in the case have yet to respond to Gomez's motion to dismiss, but legal experts believe that the court is likely to rule in her favor based on the strength of her argument.
QRコードをスキャンして、より多くの重要な情報を探索してください
Crypto投資家のためのワンストップ金融リサーチプラットフォーム

オーバーン大学のADジョン・コーエンが左レーンに、ハーシンが右レーンに。全力で攻めて、この男をスタジアムから吹き飛ばそう!

Auburn AD John Cohen in the left lane with Harsin in the right lane. Take it to the max and blow this guy out of the stadium!
Quavoscribe11-07 22:06
翻訳する
AIによる翻訳
Selena Gomez's alleged legal trouble with Celsius Energy Drink has taken an unexpected turn. Just a few months after the news broke, Gomez has filed a motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit that accused her of being involved in the development of the drink. The lawsuit claimed that Gomez's Instagram post promoting the drink led to a surge of sales and an increase in stock prices for Celsius, causing financial losses for investors. However, in a recent court filing, Gomez's attorney argued that the allegations against her are "baseless" and that she should not be held liable for promoting a product that was already on the market before her post. The motion cites several legal precedents that support Gomez's claim, including a 2008 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that a celebrity's endorsement of a product does not constitute securities fraud if the product was already being sold at retail. The plaintiffs in the case have yet to respond to Gomez's motion to dismiss, but legal experts believe that the court is likely to rule in her favor based on the strength of her argument.

16 返信数